FP
Poster for Zootopia 270Poster © Disney Enterprises, Inc. · 320×474, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.

70 they fought about it 6 critics · 30 to 88

Zootopia 2

Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means · what he keeps

How they landed
they fought about it6 critics, 30 to 88
The kindest
Zootopia 2 is pure delight, every bit as exciting and heartwarming and imaginative as the Oscar-winning original and maybe even funnier.Nell Minow, RogerEbert.com · we gave it 88
The harshest
A soulless film-by-numbers affair filled with corporately approved jokes ...Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian · we gave it 30
Film
Jared Bush and Byron Howard · 2025 · United States

The guide2 of 7 came up

very mild · mild · moderate · strong · very strong — the board’s own five words, in its own order
Violence
Sex and nudity
Swearing
Drink and drugs
Upsetting
Offensive
Hard to sit through

Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 27/11/2025. Their words: Mild threat, violence. We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.

All 6 reviews

Zootopia 2 is pure delight, every bit as exciting and heartwarming and imaginative as the Oscar-winning original and maybe even funnier.

Nell Minow, RogerEbert.com · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000123
88we gave it

More than worth the lengthy wait, knocking it out of the park with its dazzling visuals, sophisticated humor and doses of genuine emotion.

Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000124
86we gave it

On the surface, Zootopia 2 is a bunch of cartoon animals solving crime and making jokes and learning to love and appreciate each other, but lurking beyond that silliness is a seedy underbelly of social criticism that deserves to be taken seriously.

Clint Gage, IGN · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000125
80we gave it

Perhaps most delightful, though, are the carefully drawn supporting characters, with welcome returns for Flash the sloth and Maurice LaMarche, the Vito Corleone-esque arctic shrew. Truly an offer you can't refuse.

Ed Potton, The Times · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000126
78we gave it

A soulless film-by-numbers affair filled with corporately approved jokes ... the kind of movie you put on an iPad to keep the children quiet on a long plane or train journey ... the heart and soul are lacking.

Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000127
30we gave it

[spent] too much of its time away from its mammalian metropolis ... The fun caper spirit of the first movie is alive enough to carry Bush and Howard's film, but you can't help feel like sequel-ization also means domestication.

Jake Coyle, Associated Press · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000128
58we gave it

Who wrote about this filmgo read them

Carry thisdrop it into any page · nothing to sign, nothing to pay

<iframe src="https://fp.caelivonstudios.com/embed/zootopia-2/"
  width="380" height="86" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
  title="FP 70 for Zootopia 2"></iframe>

Referencesa number is issued once and never reused

  1. FP000123Nell Minow. RogerEbert.com. Zootopia 2 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Zootopia 2. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 88.Source
  2. FP000124Frank Scheck. The Hollywood Reporter. Zootopia 2 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Zootopia 2. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 86.Source
  3. FP000125Clint Gage. IGN. Zootopia 2 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Zootopia 2. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 80.Source
  4. FP000126Ed Potton. The Times. Zootopia 2 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Zootopia 2. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 78.Source
  5. FP000127Peter Bradshaw. The Guardian. Zootopia 2 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Zootopia 2. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 30.Source
  6. FP000128Jake Coyle. Associated Press. Zootopia 2 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Zootopia 2. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 58.Source