Poster © impawards.com · 320×473, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.58 they fought about it 2 critics · 35 to 82
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means
All the assembled parts here, including an especially high-quality cast (even Wendell Pierce!) work together seamlessly in a way that Marvel hasn't in some time.Jake Coyle, Associated Press · we gave it 82
It's just dollop upon dollop of dourness, all the way to an end-credits scene that has the nerve to tease brighter, less narratively convoluted times ahead.Robbie Collin, The Daily Telegraph · we gave it 35
violencePart of the board's reason for the certificate.
sex, which means the board had something to say here, not that it raised the certificate.
languagePart of the board's reason for the certificate.
drugs, which means the board had something to say here, not that it raised the certificate.
threatPart of the board's reason for the certificate.
discrimination, which means the board had something to say here, not that it raised the certificate.
Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 28/04/2025. Their words: Moderate violence, threat, language.
We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.
All the assembled parts here, including an especially high-quality cast (even Wendell Pierce!) work together seamlessly in a way that Marvel hasn't in some time. Most of all, Pugh commands every bit of the movie.
Jake Coyle, Associated Press · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000135It's just dollop upon dollop of dourness, all the way to an end-credits scene that has the nerve to tease brighter, less narratively convoluted times ahead. Talk about creating a market.
Robbie Collin, The Daily Telegraph · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000136