Poster © Sony Pictures official website · 320×480, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.79 they all agreed 2 critics · 78 to 80
Spider-Man: Brand New Day
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means
- How they landed
- they all agreed2 critics, 78 to 80
- Best thing said
A fantastic film about Peter Parker.
William Bibbiani, TheWrap · we gave it 80- Worst thing said
Dark and thrilling new chapter.
Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood · we gave it 78- Film
- Destin Daniel Cretton · 2026 · United States
The guide0 of 7 came up · the board’s words first, then the critics’
ViolenceNobody who wrote about it mentioned this
Sex and nudityNobody who wrote about it mentioned this
SwearingNobody who wrote about it mentioned this
Drink and drugsNobody who wrote about it mentioned this
UpsettingNobody who wrote about it mentioned this
OffensiveNobody who wrote about it mentioned this
Hard to sit throughNobody who wrote about it mentioned this
No classification board we can read has certified this film. We checked the British and American boards; a film that has played festivals and a limited run often has no certificate anywhere yet. Everything above is what the critics we read happened to mention. That is not the same answer asked the same way every time, and we will not dress it up as one. When a board classifies it, this fills in.
All 2 reviews
Dark and thrilling new chapter.
Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00013178we gave it
A fantastic film about Peter Parker.
William Bibbiani, TheWrap · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00013280we gave it
Who wrote about this filmgo read them
Referencesa number is issued once and never reused
- FP000131Pete Hammond. Deadline Hollywood. Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026). Quoted in Wikipedia, Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Read 2026-08-21. We scored it 78.Source
- FP000132William Bibbiani. TheWrap. Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026). Quoted in Wikipedia, Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Read 2026-08-21. We scored it 80.Source