Poster © Warner Bros. Pictures · 320×474, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.86 they all agreed 6 critics · 80 to 90
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means · what he keeps
Is a timeless story of resistance, one that playfully weaves together influences as broad-reaching as the true story of Weather Underground and cinematic depictions of rebellion, but it's also a remarkably propulsive, fun, and eventually moving piece of work about the human beings caught up in the chaotic machine.Brian Tallerico, RogerEbert.com · we gave it 90
Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 24/09/2025. Their words: Strong language, sex references, violence, references to sexual violence.
We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.
Taps into the fierce urgency of now; it gives you a chill that's also a wake-up call.
Owen Gleiberman, Variety · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000074Is a timeless story of resistance, one that playfully weaves together influences as broad-reaching as the true story of Weather Underground and cinematic depictions of rebellion, but it's also a remarkably propulsive, fun, and eventually moving piece of work about the human beings caught up in the chaotic machine.
Brian Tallerico, RogerEbert.com · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000075A father-daughter epic, with an unusually personal gush of feeling. You can count on one hand the number of scenes that Bob and Willa share, but their connection – a swirl of protectiveness, exasperation, and fiercely unconditional love – binds the movie and its madly whirling parts together.
Justin Chang, The New Yorker · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000076Searing indictment of this particular moment in American history.
Katie Walsh, Chicago Tribune · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000077A furious film, a richly engaging and persuasive polemic.
Richard Lawson, The Hollywood Reporter · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000078Magnetically self-possessed newcomer/instant movie star Chase Infiniti, whose performance inspires a strange kind of secondhand pride.
David Ehrlich, IndieWire · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000079Worth reading because it is late. The six critics we counted all filed in release week and none scored it under 80. Given a few months, this room settles on really good, not quite great, and is careful about why: the performances and the direction hold, the highs do not reach the director's own best. It also does the thing a thread can do and a review cannot, which is correct itself in public when somebody claims the film was a late play for awards and gets told it was started twenty years ago.
Go and read it<iframe src="https://fp.caelivonstudios.com/embed/one-battle-after-another/"
width="380" height="86" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
title="FP 86 for One Battle After Another"></iframe>