Poster © Focus Features · 320×474, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.Obsession
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means
- How they landed
- they argued3 critics, 55 to 82
- Best thing said
So fresh and exhilarating, one can forgive its familiar origins.
Lou Thomas, Empire · we gave it 82- Worst thing said
Proof that the Cregger-ification of 2020s horror is in full effect, as its combination of sadistic violence, ironic needle drops, and comedy mined from people responding to tragedy in pathetically self-serving ways will merit plenty of comparisons to Barbarian and Weapons.
Christian Zilko, IndieWire · we gave it 55- Film
- Curry Barker · 2025 · United States
The guide2 of 7 came up · every line is a critic’s own words
Violence1 critic mentioned it
“Proof that the Cregger-ification of 2020s horror is in full effect, as its combination of sadistic violence, ironic needle drops, and comedy mined from people responding to tragedy in pathetically self-serving ways will merit plenty of comparisons to Barbarian and Weapons.” — Christian Zilko, IndieWire
Sex and nudityNobody mentioned it
SwearingNobody mentioned it
Drink and drugsNobody mentioned it
Upsetting2 critics mentioned it
“Proof that the Cregger-ification of 2020s horror is in full effect, as its combination of sadistic violence, ironic needle drops, and comedy mined from people responding to tragedy in pathetically self-serving ways will merit plenty of comparisons to Barbarian and Weapons.” — Christian Zilko, IndieWire
“Acing one of the more physically and emotionally taxing horror leads to come down the pike in a while.” — Guy Lodge, Variety
OffensiveNobody mentioned it
Hard to sit throughNobody mentioned it
All 4 reviews
Proof that the Cregger-ification of 2020s horror is in full effect, as its combination of sadistic violence, ironic needle drops, and comedy mined from people responding to tragedy in pathetically self-serving ways will merit plenty of comparisons to Barbarian and Weapons.
Christian Zilko, IndieWire · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00007055we gave it
So fresh and exhilarating, one can forgive its familiar origins.
Lou Thomas, Empire · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00007182we gave it
The human being trapped inside.
Katie Rife, RogerEbert.com · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000072—dropped
Acing one of the more physically and emotionally taxing horror leads to come down the pike in a while.
Guy Lodge, Variety · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00007378we gave it
Who wrote about this filmgo read them
Christian ZilkoIndieWireWhere we read it
Lou ThomasEmpireWhere we read it
Katie RifeRogerEbert.comWhere we read it
Guy LodgeVarietyWhere we read it
Referencesa number is issued once and never reused
- FP000070Christian Zilko. IndieWire. Obsession (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Obsession (2025 film). Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 55.Source
- FP000071Lou Thomas. Empire. Obsession (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Obsession (2025 film). Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 82.Source
- FP000072Katie Rife. RogerEbert.com. Obsession (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Obsession (2025 film). Read 2026-08-20. Not used.Source
- FP000073Guy Lodge. Variety. Obsession (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Obsession (2025 film). Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 78.Source