FP
Poster for Jurassic World Rebirth57Poster © movieposters.com · 320×471, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.

57 they fought about it 6 critics · 28 to 74

Jurassic World Rebirth

Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means · what he keeps

How they landed
they fought about it6 critics, 28 to 74
The kindest
The latest installment marks a return to form after some recent duds, with all the expected Spielberg-style set pieces and excellent romantic chemistry between the leads.Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian · we gave it 74
The harshest
Audiences may not have run out of enthusiasm for what the Jurassic Worlds are selling, or at least they haven't yet, but the people tasked with making them sure are out of ideas.Alison Wilmore, Vulture · we gave it 28
Film
Gareth Edwards · 2025 · United States

The guide3 of 7 came up

very mild · mild · moderate · strong · very strong — the board’s own five words, in its own order
Violence
Sex and nudity
Swearing
Drink and drugs
Upsetting
Offensive
Hard to sit through

Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 25/06/2025. Their words: Moderate threat, violence, language. We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.

All 6 reviews

Edwards clearly is a devoted Spielberg fan, embedding subtle homages throughout, notably in the open water sequences that recall Jaws. Jurassic World Rebirth is unlikely to top anyone's ranked franchise list. But longtime fans should have a blast.

David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000051
68we gave it

The latest installment marks a return to form after some recent duds, with all the expected Spielberg-style set pieces and excellent romantic chemistry between the leads.

Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000052
74we gave it

It might sound like a challenge to believe these humans would sign up to visit a forbidden jungle for guaranteed encounters with truly frightening and gigantic creatures out of another time in order to essentially get blood samples, but if you are game to go with that premise, a good time will be had for all.

Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000053
70we gave it

Follows the template created by the original Jurassic Park – but it's no match for it.

Caryn James, BBC · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000054
50we gave it

Audiences may not have run out of enthusiasm for what the Jurassic Worlds are selling, or at least they haven't yet, but the people tasked with making them sure are out of ideas. Rebirth, as though fulfilling its franchise's own prophecy, really does manage to be boring.

Alison Wilmore, Vulture · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000055
28we gave it

Jurassic World Rebirth takes a step in the right direction, but the previous trilogy backed this franchise so thoroughly into a corner that it may be time to let this series go extinct.

Meagan Navarro, Bloody Disgusting · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000056
52we gave it

Who wrote about this filmgo read them

David RooneyThe Hollywood ReporterWhere we read it
Peter BradshawThe GuardianWhere we read it
Pete HammondDeadline HollywoodWhere we read it
Caryn JamesBBCWhere we read it
Alison WilmoreVultureWhere we read it
Meagan NavarroBloody DisgustingWhere we read it

What the readers worked outwe link the room and never a person in it · nothing here moves the score

r/plotholes, a list of complaints that the room argues downReddit

A complaint thread that talks itself out of most of its complaints, which is rarer than it sounds. Palaeontology readers arrive with a list; the replies answer it point by point, and the answers are better than the list. The T. rex is read as territorial rather than hungry, which changes the scene. The injured leg is explained by what adrenaline does to a man whose children are in the water. What survives the argument is a much shorter list than the one it started with.

Go and read it

Carry thisdrop it into any page · nothing to sign, nothing to pay

<iframe src="https://fp.caelivonstudios.com/embed/jurassic-world-rebirth/"
  width="380" height="86" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
  title="FP 57 for Jurassic World Rebirth"></iframe>

Referencesa number is issued once and never reused

  1. FP000051David Rooney. The Hollywood Reporter. Jurassic World Rebirth (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Jurassic World Rebirth. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 68.Source
  2. FP000052Peter Bradshaw. The Guardian. Jurassic World Rebirth (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Jurassic World Rebirth. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 74.Source
  3. FP000053Pete Hammond. Deadline Hollywood. Jurassic World Rebirth (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Jurassic World Rebirth. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 70.Source
  4. FP000054Caryn James. BBC. Jurassic World Rebirth (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Jurassic World Rebirth. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 50.Source
  5. FP000055Alison Wilmore. Vulture. Jurassic World Rebirth (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Jurassic World Rebirth. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 28.Source
  6. FP000056Meagan Navarro. Bloody Disgusting. Jurassic World Rebirth (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Jurassic World Rebirth. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 52.Source