Poster © IMDb · 320×477, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.Fireflies in the Dusk
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means
- How they landed
- they all agreed2 critics, 76 to 80
- Best thing said
Bends its genres effortlessly into a surprisingly hilarious, possibly divisive but no less poignant dramedy that has much to say about the changing times.
Barbara Keer, Splash Magazines · we gave it 80- Worst thing said
Is a vibrant, unpredictable romp that makes you laugh.
Rachel Sinclair, Film Business · we gave it 76- Film
- Jonathan Hammond · 2025 · United States · 98 min
The guide0 of 7 came up · every line is a critic’s own words
ViolenceNobody mentioned it
Sex and nudityNobody mentioned it
SwearingNobody mentioned it
Drink and drugsNobody mentioned it
UpsettingNobody mentioned it
OffensiveNobody mentioned it
Hard to sit throughNobody mentioned it
All 2 reviews
Is a vibrant, unpredictable romp that makes you laugh.
Rachel Sinclair, Film Business · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00003376we gave it
Bends its genres effortlessly into a surprisingly hilarious, possibly divisive but no less poignant dramedy that has much to say about the changing times.
Barbara Keer, Splash Magazines · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00003480we gave it
Who wrote about this filmgo read them
Rachel SinclairFilm BusinessWhere we read it
Barbara KeerSplash MagazinesWhere we read it
Referencesa number is issued once and never reused
- FP000033Rachel Sinclair. Film Business. Fireflies in the Dusk (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Fireflies in the Dusk. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 76.Source
- FP000034Barbara Keer. Splash Magazines. Fireflies in the Dusk (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, Fireflies in the Dusk. Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 80.Source