Poster © IMP Awards · 320×474, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.F1
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means
- How they landed
- they split3 critics, 55 to 76
- Best thing said
A deft addition to a sturdy lineage of motorsport flicks, from Rush and Gran Turismo to Ford v Ferrari and, most recently, Ferrari.
Lovia Gyarkye, The Hollywood Reporter · we gave it 76- Worst thing said
Solid enough nonsense for a little bit of escapism.
Phillip Horton, Autoweek · we gave it 55- Film
- Joseph Kosinski · 2025 · United States
The guide0 of 7 came up · every line is a critic’s own words
ViolenceNobody mentioned it
Sex and nudityNobody mentioned it
SwearingNobody mentioned it
Drink and drugsNobody mentioned it
UpsettingNobody mentioned it
OffensiveNobody mentioned it
Hard to sit throughNobody mentioned it
All 3 reviews
A deft addition to a sturdy lineage of motorsport flicks, from Rush and Gran Turismo to Ford v Ferrari and, most recently, Ferrari.
Lovia Gyarkye, The Hollywood Reporter · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00003076we gave it
Entertaining, but hardcore racing fans will wince.
Fred Smith, Road & Track · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00003160we gave it
Solid enough nonsense for a little bit of escapism.
Phillip Horton, Autoweek · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00003255we gave it
Who wrote about this filmgo read them
Lovia GyarkyeThe Hollywood ReporterWhere we read it
Fred SmithRoad & TrackWhere we read it
Phillip HortonAutoweekWhere we read it
Referencesa number is issued once and never reused
- FP000030Lovia Gyarkye. The Hollywood Reporter. F1 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, F1 (film). Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 76.Source
- FP000031Fred Smith. Road & Track. F1 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, F1 (film). Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 60.Source
- FP000032Phillip Horton. Autoweek. F1 (2025). Quoted in Wikipedia, F1 (film). Read 2026-08-20. We scored it 55.Source