Poster © IMP Awards · 320×474, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.64 they split 3 critics · 55 to 76
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means · what he keeps
A deft addition to a sturdy lineage of motorsport flicks, from Rush and Gran Turismo to Ford v Ferrari and, most recently, Ferrari.Lovia Gyarkye, The Hollywood Reporter · we gave it 76
Solid enough nonsense for a little bit of escapism.Phillip Horton, Autoweek · we gave it 55
Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 25/06/2025. Their words: Infrequent strong language, moderate threat.
We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.
A deft addition to a sturdy lineage of motorsport flicks, from Rush and Gran Turismo to Ford v Ferrari and, most recently, Ferrari.
Lovia Gyarkye, The Hollywood Reporter · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000030Entertaining, but hardcore racing fans will wince.
Fred Smith, Road & Track · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000031Solid enough nonsense for a little bit of escapism.
Phillip Horton, Autoweek · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000032<iframe src="https://fp.caelivonstudios.com/embed/f1/"
width="380" height="86" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
title="FP 64 for F1"></iframe>