Poster © dam.gettyimages.com · 320×474, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.62 they split 2 critics · 52 to 72
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means
A decent political thriller with something culturally resonant to say that exceeds mere comic-book particulars.Katie Walsh, Los Angeles Times · we gave it 72
The only wisps of tangible political intrigue to be found.Brandon Yu, The New York Times · we gave it 52
violencePart of the board's reason for the certificate.
nudity,
sex, which means the board had something to say here, not that it raised the certificate.
languagePart of the board's reason for the certificate.
drugs, which means the board had something to say here, not that it raised the certificate.
discrimination, which means the board had something to say here, not that it raised the certificate.
Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 10/02/2025. Their words: Moderate violence, bloody images, language.
We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.
The only wisps of tangible political intrigue to be found.
Brandon Yu, The New York Times · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000129A decent political thriller with something culturally resonant to say that exceeds mere comic-book particulars.
Katie Walsh, Los Angeles Times · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000130